Here is the contents of this site.

https://www.goldennumber.net/site-map/

See also:

https://www.phimatrix.com/applications/

This should get you started.

What else it used and found in I need it for my presentation? please be quick

Many thanks.
We have a divine ratio described quite divinely on the front page of Shake-Speares sonnets. What is fascinating is we also appear to have e., and it’s 1609.
I will avoid posting my analysis of this to date in here, it may get spam busted anyway,, I made a short 20 minutes video analysing the accuracy of this. If you are interested in this please contact me. mc_lester@yahoo.co.uk

No record of evidence that I know of for the Greek’s use of the Fibonacci series, but for their application of the golden ratio see https://www.goldennumber.net/parthenon-golden-ratio-design/.

i agree man

If aliens do come by any means involving moving matter across space, the technological knowledge that got them here will certainly have had a foundation in mathematics. As Galileo said, “Mathematics is the language with which God has written the universe.” Should make for interesting conversation at our first intra-galactic dinner event.

I’m leaving open the possibility that aliens could transport or appear to us as in stories of angels. That might involve a different form of energy than we now know, and not require all the same mathematical calculations to get here.

I agree. I should have been clearer in my use of the term “science” in contrast to “scientism” or any other abuse that falls short of true “science.” Science should be nothing more or less than a methodology of investigation of the evidence that produces the most accurate and truthful conclusions about the nature of things. Scientism, by contrast, is like any other form of religion or belief system. It starts with a particular viewpoint in mind and filters out evidence that contradicts it. As described by Wikipedia, “Scientism is the promotion of science as the best or only objective means by which society should determine normative and epistemological values.” If the evidence indicates logical reasons to conclude that a supreme intelligence is behind the design of life, then true science would openly explore that possibility rather than categorically dismissing it as being “unscientific” as those practicing scientism do. Humankind has made great strides forward in applying the scientific method of investigation, and lost its way when believing that scientism and science are one in the same. Here’s a video I compiled of other videos that express this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcGw21Wbcgk

I think you are mistaking the scientific method for practice. The scientific method, unlike religious or profane belief systems, does not seek to prove anything. The premise is to disprove (as in the use of the null hypothesis), and reduce through repetition the likelihood that notions of chance and metaphysics may be the cause of observed phenomena or results. For example, your statement the monotheism has lasted for thousands of years, is contentious and false, easily disprovable in the historic analysis of modern and medieval archaeology, extant architecture and texts, oral and written. Scientific method was being practiced by many Socratic, Platonists, Daoists. Evidence from modern hunter-gatherer observations and anthropological observations of those bands no longer allowed to survive, all show the global prevalence of scientific deductive, inductive and inferential methods as a preferred means of analysing the environment to survive.