Comments on: Meisner Beauty Guide for Golden Ratio Facial Analysis

By: Clay

Clay — Mon, 07 Oct 2024 13:59:42 +0000

What is with the shape of the facial feature, eyes, brows, nose, mouth….

By: Piyush Patel

Piyush Patel — Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:50:18 +0000

Hi,
I have seen many face ratios for drawing faces, but none of them included the measurement/guide for eyes that I noticed. Like in your figure of 33 points. if we join points 16 14 and 17 it must fall on the same line. and the same for other eye join 13-15-18 must fall on the same line.
Thanks
Piyush

By: Gary B Meisner

Gary B Meisner — Sat, 09 Jul 2022 09:17:11 +0000

In reply to abderrahmane louhkira.

I’ve not done nearly as much research on the feet. Seems there aren’t nearly as many photos of famous feet as there are famous faces. There do seem to be though golden proportions in our feet as well. See my article at https://www.goldennumber.net/human-hand-foot/.

By: abderrahmane louhkira

abderrahmane louhkira — Tue, 14 Jun 2022 16:55:40 +0000

I have a question, can this golden ratio measure the beauty of feet and how???

By: Gary B Meisner

Gary B Meisner — Sat, 04 Sep 2021 14:58:20 +0000

In reply to mohanjit.

The formula in article is correct, and quite simple. Copy and paste =5^.5*.5+.5 into Excel and it will produce 1.618034…

Your formula is mathematically correct, but lack the simplicity and elegance of =5^.5*.5+.5

By: mohanjit

mohanjit — Sun, 29 Aug 2021 14:15:07 +0000

In reply to Gary B Meisner. the correct equation is PHI= .5(.5+.5+(5^.5))

By: Gary B Meisner

Gary B Meisner — Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:18:29 +0000

In reply to Andrew Marcus. Hi Andrew. I've seen teams of university professors doing official studies on facial attractiveness who completely botched their measures of golden ratios in faces. I'd be interested to see the three facial images you used and how you performed your measurements. If you send them via the Contact page I'll include my analysis of the results here. Thanks, Gary P.S. By the way, a sample of just 3 people is not nearly a large enough sample size to come to any conclusions that have statistical reliability.

By: Andrew Marcus

Andrew Marcus — Mon, 26 Jul 2021 01:05:35 +0000

In reply to Cassandra Porter. I measured three people's ratios in my workplace (we do facial recognition and used some of the hardware on our break) and the one with the least perfect golden ratios was the one who is by far the most attractive- prom queen and ex-UCLA cheerleader. But whatever makes you feel young.

By: Cassandra Porter

Cassandra Porter — Sat, 15 Aug 2020 02:22:15 +0000

I have found your ratios to make the most sense and agree with your markers! You want to use well-defined boundaries that the eye often looks at, not midpoints that actually have no set boundaries. Using your vertical ratios, I found that my face was falling to about 96% of the Golden ratio, except for the ratio of my lower nostrils to top lip versus top lip to middle of lips. My thinner lips DESTROYED that ratio (I was only within 50% of the Golden there). I got a perfect golden between top and bottom lip thicknesses. I got another perfect golden between the bottom of my nose, top of lip, and middle of lips (not a proportion you suggested). It would be interesting to know if a person with more rosebud type lips could still possess a proportionality of beauty using this other ratio. The attractive woman in the images above labelled 0.36 face seems to also follow this proportionality I’ve suggested. Or maybe we both just need lip injections….heh heh.

By: Eugene Gauggel

Eugene Gauggel — Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:37:29 +0000

In reply to Phil Hammond. Yes, I agree. I feel it when it is in good proportion. I feel balanced and grounded. Otherwise, with disproportionate faces I get bothered without knowing exactly why.