Please provide links to your works and proof. Without that, it’s just words. Thanks!

and also people who don’t give a damn about being important, anonymous…
I looked at the graph and noticed that it was wrong! Sorry!
I haven’t found the link with the squaring of the circle yet, yet I am convinced that there is one?
I made a graph that demonstrates it!
it is the royal cubit that is the real measurement, 220 *x2= 440 =hz?

Interesting theory, but there are many independent methods which all confirm pi to be the traditional value of 3.14159…

You need to add more detail to your analysis, geometrically and mathematically, so that each step can be investigated and verified. The problem with a narrative approach like this is that any flaw in any assumption will result in a flawed conclusion. For instance, how exactly does one “make 4 right triangles out of a circle” and what is the basis for dividing by 0.9?

I don’t believe they squared the circle as some suggest. I believe they ised pythagorean theorem and were exact, but due to time, heat and settling, etc. It seems as though their measurements were done using another method. I believe they made 4 right triangles out of a circle. Using the radius they could find a²+b² to find their c². Once they square c you divide it by .9

This gives you the correct distance after accounting for the added distance of the 90° curve. Multiply that by 4, now divide that by your radius. You will always get 3.1426968053 it’s an irrational number so that isn’t the end of it, but it’s enough to prove the point. By the way this is the same as square root of (72 x .9) ÷3

That 3.1426968053 is the same thing you will get if you take an octagon and apply the same method to create a circle out of it. Take the octagon and cut it into 4 pieces like we did with the circle(hints the octagonal pyramid) now say you know the length of the sides but not the diameter of the octagon. Look at the right triangle you made. You have 2 sides, say they are 17 foot each. Add them together we have 34. 34² = 1,156

Divide that by 2 you get 578. Find the square root of 578 and you get 24.0416305603.

Multiply that by 2. Now you have your diameter which is 48.0832611206

Now take your sides which were 17. Multiply them by 2 so we are back to a right angle which comes out to 34. Divide 34 by .9 and you get 37.77777777778

Now multiply that by 4 for your full 360° circumference measurement. You get 151.11111111112

Divide that by your diameter which we determined was 48.0832611206

You get true pi. 3.1426968053

3.1426968053 x 2 x (180/3.1426968053) = 359.99999999998

What is currently used comes out to 360.0000000001

3.1426968054 does not compute any indifference up to the ten billionths place.

Here are the proportions of the Great Pyramid triangle:

Full Base = 2a = 2.00000
Triangle Base = a = 1.00000
Height = b = 1.27202 (Square root of Phi)
Hypotenuse = c = 1.61803 (Phi)

So when the height is 240, these are the resulting proportions:

Full Base = 2a = 377.35266
Triangle Base = a = 188.67633
Height = b = 240.00000
Hypotenuse = c = 305.28472

Here’s a chart that may help with other conversions:

If I want to build a pyramid with a height of 240cm but with the great giza pyramid’s base ratios and side angles, what size should be the base?

Thank you

They must have been using basic science of that time. Times Table and digital root,
The base of pyramid is 440 cubit and height 280 cubit , If you divide by 40 you get 11 and 7..so 40=> 4+0=>4. so we have 4,7,11 which are part numbers of Lucas sequence so here we have PHI and PI. The base of pyramid will have like 4×11 or 8×5.5 squares. so we have the base of 8×8 squares like chess board. If we write times table from 1 to 8 on this square and convert the numbers using digital root we will get very interesting result. Before conversion on diagonal we will have 1sqr, 2sqr,2sqr …….. They did not need Pythagoras Theorem to calculate that 3SQR+4SQR=5SQR. They have this from times table. After converting all numbers in squares to they digital root you get in one diagonal 1,4,7 and in other diagonal 2.5.8. Do you know what is this? The answer is law of doubling 1,2,4,8,16,32 …. converted in digital root.1,2,4,8,7,5 and will repeat itself. Since 1,4,7 can be represented like triangle with three dots equally distanced between them also 2,5,8 like another triangle. than sum of two will give you Star of David used in BABILON. So there is no much high science needed.

Regards

Bajrush Kelmendi

So isn’t the base of the Great prymid perimeter almost the same number of the speed of light only off by 1

All math assumptions are wrong. The pyramid has 8 sides. The variance between the base/8 produces a linear measurement that is slightly less than base/4 due to simple “lag” in the actual dimensions. Factor in that and you get a better correlation with angles and geometry. No?